It's Official: The Democrats, Including Obama And Herseth Sandlin Have No Backbone

As the excuses and self-serving explanations fly from Congressional Democrats as to why they caved, the fact remains that they did cave and actually gave Mr. 25% more than he asked for when they passed the Telecom Immunity Act FISA reform bill yesterday.

The proposal — particularly the immunity provision — represents a major victory for the White House after months of dispute. “I think the White House got a better deal than they even they had hoped to get,” said Senator Christopher Bond, the Missouri Republican who led the negotiations.

So the next time you see our illustrious Congresswoman Stephanie Herseth Sandlin you can thank her for being one of 105 Republicans Democrats that sided against protecting our civil liberties when she voted to effectivey legalized warrantless wiretaps on US citizens and to give Telcoms retroactive immunity for spying on us before they had the power to do so. She joins our other national Republican Democrat Tim Johnson, who was one of 18 democratic Senators to voted similarly back in February and made it a complete South Dakota sellout.

And while we are thanking folks, be sure and thank presumptive nominee Barack Obama, he decided that he could live with being the benefactor of such far reaching legislation and still pander to those outraged over the telcom immunity by pledging to work to remove that part of the legislation.

Given the grave threats that we face, our national security agencies must have the capability to gather intelligence and track down terrorists before they strike, while respecting the rule of law and the privacy and civil liberties of the American people. There is also little doubt that the Bush Administration, with the cooperation of major telecommunications companies, has abused that authority and undermined the Constitution by intercepting the communications of innocent Americans without their knowledge or the required court orders.

That is why last year I opposed the so-called Protect America Act, which expanded the surveillance powers of the government without sufficient independent oversight to protect the privacy and civil liberties of innocent Americans. I have also opposed the granting of retroactive immunity to those who were allegedly complicit in acts of illegal spying in the past.

After months of negotiation, the House today passed a compromise that, while far from perfect, is a marked improvement over last year’s Protect America Act.

Under this compromise legislation, an important tool in the fight against terrorism will continue, but the President’s illegal program of warrantless surveillance will be over. It restores FISA and existing criminal wiretap statutes as the exclusive means to conduct surveillance – making it clear that the President cannot circumvent the law and disregard the civil liberties of the American people. It also firmly re-establishes basic judicial oversight over all domestic surveillance in the future. It does, however, grant retroactive immunity, and I will work in the Senate to remove this provision so that we can seek full accountability for past offenses. But this compromise guarantees a thorough review by the Inspectors General of our national security agencies to determine what took place in the past, and ensures that there will be accountability going forward. By demanding oversight and accountability, a grassroots movement of Americans has helped yield a bill that is far better than the Protect America Act.

It is not all that I would want. But given the legitimate threats we face, providing effective intelligence collection tools with appropriate safeguards is too important to delay. So I support the compromise, but do so with a firm pledge that as President, I will carefully monitor the program, review the report by the Inspectors General, and work with the Congress to take any additional steps I deem necessary to protect the lives – and the liberty – of the American people.

I guess we deserve whatever we get come January, more of the same McCain, or no change Obama. Is there a lesser of 2 evils?

Please follow and like us: